The Free Scott: A blog from Scotland the land of wonderful scenery and in parts unspeakable deprivation caused in a large part by its distant governance by Westminster.
During the European referendum campaign and after ‘Leave’
voters have complained about being called racist and xenophobic whether they
actually are or not.
At the beginning of the campaign I didn’t start as an active
remainer. I started as someone who was going to vote ‘Remain’ or not vote at
all, as I felt the entire referendum wasn’t really relevant to Scotland. In my
arrogance I thought any fool could see Scotland was better off in the European
Union at least as long as we were in that other ‘union’ the UK.At that time it was not so much what the EU
has done for us recently, it was more what it protected us from with a constant
Conservative Government in London.
The actual European Referendum campaigns were in my opinion awful from
both sides.
We had a second Project Fear from the UK Remain side. I
assume the thoughts on that one were that Project Fear had worked for the Scots
during their independence referendum campaign in 2014 so it would work on the
UK as a whole. The anti-independence side won (but only just) validating that
type of campaign. In Scotland we had a rather lack lustre Remain campaign which
was different. It was a campaign based on the benefits of being in the European
Union. Despite the UK being in the EU almost all of my adult life at that stage
I had no real idea of what it did for us, and indeed until the EU referendum
campaign came up it was an extremely rare occurrence to actually see or here
anything that was happening in the European Parliament except when it was
portrayed in a very negative way by the English tabloid press.
It was only as the campaign went on that I became an active
Remainer, despite my discomfort at several sections of EU policies which I
believe were not in the interests of people but just of big business.
My activity on the Remain side was due to the Leave campaign
which I found morally repugnant. It seemed to be based on two premises. It had its
own version of Project Fear which hardly enamoured me to it, but that also
applied to the other side. What it contained was a Project Hate campaign of
encouraging the fears of the unknown, of being over-run by foreigners from the
other EU member countries, of the EU being opened up to Turkey a Muslim
country, of being opened to vast numbers of migrants – in other words the
classic far right reactionary xenophobia angle. Neither campaign was based on
fact which made this type of campaign all the easier to employ.
And so we got to the counting of the votes. In general this
resulted in a strong Leave vote in the areas of the UK (outside Scotland) that
received most in assistance from the UK’s membership of the EU. The Leave areas
tend to be the poorest, those most left behind in the new non-manufacturing
economy created by the Conservatives and continued by Labour Governments since
the 1980s. This is why they receive the most assistance from the EU. It can
therefore be credibly argued that the EU was being blamed for the ills which
were actually created or exacerbated by the UK the Government.
The Leave areas
also tend to be those areas which are least cosmopolitan and have had the least
immigration meaning that immigrants from Europe are more unusual and therefore more
strange or foreign. And therefore more scary making the xenophobic type of campaign more effective.
Following on from it can be deduced that these areas are
also in for a rude of awakening when #Brexit actually occurs, as they have
actually made their situation even worse.
Since the vote the Conservative Government in London has
taken the vote to be a vote as being a vote against uncontrolled immigration
from the European Union. And this is the plank of their policy over Brexit
above everything else despite what harm it may do to the economy. It has been
shown time and time again that European migration has actually helped the UK
economy (particularly in Scotland).
The reason therefore why Leave voters are being called ‘racists’
or ‘xenophobic’ is quite simple. Just like the success of the Better Together
or NO campaign validated the Project Fear campaign employed by the Remainers on
this occasion, the success of the Leave campaign which was mainly based on
racist and xenophobic language and images has validated that language and behaviour.
And this is what Leave voters are perceived whether rightly or wrongly to have
voted for.
60 years ago this Saturday the Treaty of Rome was signed
meaning the European Union is 60 years old this weekend.
For the last 60 years, European nations have worked together
to create our continent’s longest ever period of peace, freedom, stability and prosperity.
The UK is also the only country to have turned down its invitation to the
special events to celebrate this momentous anniversary and will therefore not
be represented.
On Sunday our clocks go forward an hour as it is spring. On
the day Article 50 is triggered by the UK Government to leave the European
Union the clocks will go back 60 years.
Scotland voted to Remain in the EU in June 2016. I believe
we did this because it makes us safer, our country wealthier through access to
the EU single market of more than 500 million people, it makes our country
fairer with EU directives that have provided us with the fundamental right not
to be discriminated against, as well as the right to be paid holidays, parental
leave other benefits and very importantly the reconvened Scottish Parliament.
It has also protected us from the worst excesses of Tory Governments in
Westminster. We also have the EU to thank for funding for projects across
Scotland – for example the University of Saint Andrews receives a quarter of
its funding from the EU, and as a result of free movement is able to attract
talent from across the Union.
At this time Scotland faces being removed from our European
family against out clearly expressed democratic will, without even a token
gesture to indicate that our country’s collective opinion has counted for
anything. Can the UK therefore be credibly considered a state made up of 4
equal nations when 2 of those nations are being effectively ignored? The future
of Scotland should not be imposed upon us. It should be the choice of the
people of Scotland.
After all in Scotland sovereignty lies with the people, a
fundamentally different concept to that in England and Wales where sovereignty
lies in parliament. This is why for example Mary was Queen of Scots and not
Scotland, whilst Queen Elizabeth the 1st was the Queen of England.
Alyn Smith, SNP MEP states “Make no mistake, Europe is
interested in Scotland. We are a good news story for Europe, and our First
Minister really made our European neighbours take notice when she used her
first speech after the UK wide Brexit result to reassure EU nationals living in
Scotland: ‘This is your home: you remain welcome here and your contribution is
valued’”.
He also says “It’s time for Scotland to roll up its sleeves
and make its own moves on the global stage. Last week, I addressed the European
Parliament, President Tusk and President Juncker and told them that, just as
the EU will not be intimidated by threats from the London government, neither
will Scotland. It is only right that our national parliament in Edinburgh
debate, and decide, on Scotland’s interests. What self respecting parliament or
government would not? We will not be bystanders as the Tories steer the ship
towards the rocks.”
This is why the Scottish Government is seeking a mandate to ask
the UK Government to hold a further independence referendum as a means to allow
the Scottish people the right to choose their future in very different times
from only 2 and half years ago. This looks very likely to be granted as the
Scottish Greens are in favour and will be able to carry the vote with the SNP
who had a very clear mandate for it their manifesto….
‘The Scottish Parliament should have the right to hold
another independence referendum if there is a significant and material change
in the circumstances that prevailed in 2014 such as Scotland being taken out of
the European Union against our will’.
That manifesto commitment combined with the result of the
Scottish election in 2016 which returned a pro-independence majority, and then
the outcome of the EU referendum gives the Scottish Government an
unquestionable democratic mandate for an independence referendum.
The UK Government’s reaction has been to state categorically
that ‘Now is not the time’. The Scottish Government agrees with this as it
never wanted a referendum before the terms of the UK’s exit are agreed.
The sensible time to have a referendum will be when
agreement (or not) has been reached with the EU as to the terms of separation
but before the UK actually leaves the EU. This would allow the Scottish people
to make an informed choice between these 2 futures, both of which involve
change. The referendum could be held while the other parliaments in the other
EU countries are ratifying the agreement. This window of time corresponds
exactly to that stated by the Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.
Another reason for the timing of the independence referendum
before Brexit is to allow EU nationals who did not have the opportunity to vote
in the EU referendum a vote. It is important that they should, as in the last
independence referendum, have the right to vote on something that will affect
them more than most other sections of the community. Thanks to the Brexit vote
this group of people feel less welcome and some have started to leave all
ready. Scotland needs EU migration to reduce the impact of the impending
demographic time bomb caused by an ageing population and shrinking tax base. Without
them Scotland may not be able to preserve many of the essential services that
it presently provides for its population as it will not have the money. Presently
however the UK Government is in charge of immigration and looks set on Brexit
to make it much more difficult for people from the EU to come and work here. This
I believe is one of the most fundamental problems with Brexit. It will compound
problems that all ready exist.
Scotland’s people should have the right to decide their
future. We cannot avoid change, but we can choose the change we want.